Making People Better? Lessons from Serenity on Moral Enhancement

Making People Better? Lessons from Serenity on Moral Enhancement

Barbara Stock

Gallaumet University

Abstract

In this paper I use the 2005 science fiction film Serenity to consider whether moral bioenhancement is uniquely problematic—that is, beyond other forms of human modification, such as physical or cognitive enhancement. In doing so, I assess five objections to moral bioenhancement: we lack consensus on what morality is; the consequences could be dire; it is extremely hard to get this kind of enhancement right; and moral enhancement could conflict with human freedom in two distinct ways. While Serenity seems set against moral enhancement, I conclude that the objections are concerning but not decisive.

About the Author:

Barbara Stock earned her PhD in philosophy from Syracuse University and is an associate professor of philosophy at Gallaudet University. Her research focuses on moral philosophy, disability studies, and examining philosophical problems through science fiction. Some favorite course offerings include Logic, Animal Rights, AI Ethics, Science Fiction Philosophy, and Ethics in Popular Culture. Outside of academia, she enjoys baking sci-fi themed treats.

---

Published: 2025 – 08 – 22